Redstonesystem VITO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRedstonesystem VITO  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H110M4-C33
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 183
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 497
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 540
34% 540 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 42.6
26% 34.7 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 34
Splatting 23.9
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 118 82 101 82 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 350
Write 279
Mixed 273
SusWrite 88.9
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 15.3
74% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 5.4
31% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
152GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 97 101 101 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 99.9
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 97.2
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VITO Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Redstonesystem VITO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback