Performance Results


Gaming 253% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 252% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	288% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '23 at 01:50
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Memory 84.9 1-Core 141 2-Core 262 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 913 88% 724 Pts	64-Core 1,425 88% 1,425 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,790 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% MSI(1462 5102) CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	288% Outstanding	Lighting 413 Reflection 500 Parallax 692 337% 535 fps	MRender 476 Gravity 509 Splatting 271 328% 418 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 407%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 301 304 304 301 303 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 310 Mixed 312 SusWrite 297 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 34 126% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 246 209% 307 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 512GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 149 151 149 152 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 160 Write 150 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 151 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2K4266C19 2x8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4100 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 19.5 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 22.1 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	485x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	457x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	379x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	229x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	208x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $871

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16