To be filled by O.E.M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardTo be filled by O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 20:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 323
95% 184 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 787
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 13.2
9% 13.5 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 13.8
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
YSR256GMLCT-E3C-2 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 309 830 456 148 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 753
Write 884
Mixed 782
SusWrite 470
163% 722 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 66
259% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 524
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 541
458% 654 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 169%
Great: 251%
Spcc Sol id State Disk 2TB
449GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 311 264 224 256 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S1MF-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical be filled by O.E.M Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To be filled by O.E.M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback