| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDVP2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181011 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | May 18 '23 at 14:26 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 78% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.2%
Above average
|
64% 106 Pts
|
28% 213 Pts
|
14% 231 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.4%
Average
|
48% 63.3 fps
|
50% 61.9 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR4 2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.5%
Very good
|
74% 25.9 GB/s
|
57% 20 GB/s
|
47% 84.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDVP2 Builds (Compare 17 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDVP2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 5x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 5x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $379 |