HP ZBook Power G7 Mobile Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook Power G7 Mobile Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87EC
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 11:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 194
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 395
45% 352 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 87EC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 17
Parallax 7.6
5% 10.4 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.3
8% 9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1012 1066 875 1029 1209 1138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,367
Write 1175
Mixed 1,131
SusWrite 1,055
266% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 53.6
177% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 569
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 506
354% 451 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 193%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 22.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Power G7 Mobile Workstation Builds (Compare 590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Power G7 Mobile Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback