Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 UD  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 09:43
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1096
99% 831 Pts
64-Core 2,785
172% 2,785 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Lighting 137
Reflection 117
Parallax 134
112% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 723 478 554 608 615 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,889
Write 2,859
Mixed 1,868
SusWrite 682
412% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 73.8
230% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1,100
820% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 238%
Great: 491%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
561GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 151 151 150 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 157
Write 154
Mixed 120
SusWrite 151
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1
36% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 36%
Mb2000gc WDA 2TB
77GB free
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 174
Write 41.7
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 39.2
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 57 61 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 64.6
Write 58.1
Mixed 54
SusWrite 58.5
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
465GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 102 102 102 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 56.3
Write 99.1
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 102
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 37.3
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 33
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 UD Builds (Compare 1,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback