Lenovo 20AWS0Q300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20AWS0Q300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWS0Q300
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 16:52
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$46
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 160
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 314
33% 262 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.9
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MaxMem-256GB 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 317
Mixed 8
56% 260 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0
14% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 93%
SSDPR-S400U-240-42 240GB
75GB free
Firmware: SBFME1.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,086
Write 12.7
Mixed 20.5
284% 1,373 MB/s
4K Read 522
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2
794% 175 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 23.9
Mixed 30.3
54% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
93% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20AWS0Q300 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20AWS0Q300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback