Toshiba SATELLITE Radius 12 P20W-C-10K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE Radius 12 P20W-C-10K  (all builds)
MotherboardFF40 06C0
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151119
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 34.1
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 52.6
29% 45.8 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 185
19% 155 Pts
64-Core 73.9
5% 73.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Toshiba(1179 F870) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 149 137 122 104 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 400
Write 343
Mixed 326
SusWrite 135
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 27.8
97% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 327
236% 304 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EE-EGCE 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 8.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE Radius 12 P20W-C-10K Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE Radius 12 P20W-C-10K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback