Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 571
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 88.9
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 45.5
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 213 60 58 83 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 432
Write 276
Mixed 110
SusWrite 112
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 22.8
58% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 205
136% 157 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
390GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 146 148 146 147 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 162
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 148
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.2 5.8 10 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback