Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 08:43
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 129
55% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 242
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7730
Sapphire(174B E252) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.97% Terrible
Lighting 7.83
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 10.5
6% 9.83 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 8
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.74 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.97%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
451GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 157
Mixed 70.7
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.44
120% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 112%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.01D06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 46
Write 47.8
Mixed 23.7
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2400 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback