Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TP67B+ (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120706
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '15 at 16:37
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 98.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 230 85% 148 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 453 60% 452 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9295) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 60.5 Parallax 82.6 52% 69.1 fps	MRender 59.9 Gravity 54.7 Splatting 77.3 54% 64 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8426 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 827 (B1) Unknown 95 95 49 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 36 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 511 (EB) Unknown 99 99 224 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16562017548	70.1% Very good	Read 508 Write 343 Mixed 346 88% 399 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 17.7 92% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.1 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 61.8 40% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 52GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8425 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 828 (B1) Unknown 96 96 45 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 38 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 20 (EB) Unknown 99 99 220 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11437969589	83% Excellent	Read 504 Write 347 Mixed 355 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 21.1 104% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 81.6 105% 191 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 118%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 480GB free Firmware: MK7OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 89 (03) Spinup time 128 128 42982900179 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4020 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18542 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1221 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4293 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4293 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 240519544867 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 842	54.9% Above average	Read 107 Write 84.3 Mixed 94.3 72% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.31 86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 83%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 2,298 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 459GB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 94.4 Write 30.6 Mixed 31.5 54% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 0.27 4K Mixed 0.16 17% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-17000CL9-4GBSR F3-17000CL9-4GBSR 8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 26.4 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 22 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 44.3 90% 44.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	13x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	6x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	2x
TEAML5Lite3D1T 1TBBench 105%, 1,722 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 46%, 14 samples	5x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 517 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 1,020 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $885

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16