HP 500-166el

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-166el  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory6.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 04:10
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 104
46% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 146
18% 141 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3575 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 120
Parallax 137
106% 129 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 120
Splatting 114
112% 141 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$40
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 315 310 341 349 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 389
Mixed 360
SusWrite 319
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 48.1
139% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 254
192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 CT51264BD160B.M16F 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-166el Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: HP 500-166el

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $685
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback