Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V13.1
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 111
54% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 491
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8703) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 101
Parallax 60.7
48% 73.3 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 62.2
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 417 237 107 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 422
Write 275
Mixed 358
SusWrite 216
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 28.4
97% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 302
220% 284 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 91%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 396 365 62 64 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 418
Write 375
Mixed 344
SusWrite 224
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 17.2
84% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 29
72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V13.1 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback