HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88DD
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230222
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 15:56
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User YEM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 303
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,080
100% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,330
82% 1,330 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
HP(103C 88DD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.1% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 41.8
33% 40.6 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 42.3
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-256G-1006 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,457
Write 1,792
Mixed 1,355
344% 1,535 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 53.7
185% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 880
662% 890 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 224%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 72 73 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 69.1
Write 85.6
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 72.1
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
156% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 27.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 29.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx Builds (Compare 2,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback