HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88DD
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 05:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User YEM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 299
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,090
100% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,322
82% 1,322 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
HP(103C 88DD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.2% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 42.4
33% 40.8 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 42.7
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-256G-1006 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,547
Write 1,844
Mixed 1,402
358% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 49.3
196% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 227
190% 282 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 224%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
174GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 83 82 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 28.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 31
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx Builds (Compare 2,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback