HP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82B4
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 02:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 203
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 591
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acclamator 512GB 512GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1397 1483 1365 102 108 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,694
Write 1,435
Mixed 1,165
SusWrite 763
283% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 54.1
174% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 747
543% 705 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 199%
Great: 251%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
460GB free
Firmware: AV006D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 106 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 103
Write 85.7
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 108
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBR - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.C16FP 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 22.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback