MEI G218

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMEI G218  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z77 Extreme4
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 20:28
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 163
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 381
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Zotac(19DA 1280) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 23% Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 278 281 297 293 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 339
Write 320
Mixed 331
SusWrite 286
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 33
108% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 172
127% 169 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
459GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 316 317 355 365 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 474
Write 419
Mixed 384
SusWrite 340
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 35
118% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 226
179% 254 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 134%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 126 128 128 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 127
Write 123
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 127
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 129 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 140
Write 129
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 131
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 100%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
531GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 89 89 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 92.4
Write 97.9
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 89.5
118% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
764GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 92.2
Write 94.3
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 104
123% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 60%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
7TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 27.7
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 25.5
41% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.1
120% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD63I1C08ZZE1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G218 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: MEI G218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $712
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback