Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 929
90% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,448
90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Zotac(19DA 6527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 129
Parallax 112
94% 119 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 94.3
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 42 45 51 50 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 389
Write 417
Mixed 375
SusWrite 61.2
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 39
136% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 157
123% 167 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 96%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2386 2451 2488 2489 2488 2485 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 2492
Mixed 2,357
SusWrite 2,464
554% 2,453 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 90.5
292% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1033
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 851
644% 871 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 381%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2529 2535 2537 2534 2535 2535 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,510
Write 2,559
Mixed 2,372
SusWrite 2,534
563% 2494 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 95
307% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 855
637% 854 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 389%
Great: 435%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
726GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 105 103 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 118
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 103
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
809GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 104
Write 119
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 108
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 32.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $599
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback