PC Intel Z270

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC Intel Z270  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z270-P
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 756
75% 614 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2136 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 143
Parallax 132
114% 138 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 141
Splatting 122
100% 121 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 107%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1030 1930 1704 1312 1263 978 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,447
Write 2,105
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 1,370
420% 1,875 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 79.4
272% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 1,085
813% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 314%
Great: 598%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
769GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 465 463 464 464 466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 438
Mixed 373
SusWrite 463
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 50.2
162% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 290
238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 534 533 535 534 536 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 595
Write 480
Mixed 469
SusWrite 532
117% 519 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 48.1
154% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 336
232% 288 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 116%
Great: 276%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 139 139 140 138 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 140
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 137
172% 129 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1.1
506% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 1
438% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 91%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Panram PUD43000C154G2NJK Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 PUD43000C154G2NJK Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 24GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 29.1
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 29.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Z270 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

System: PC Intel Z270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback