TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TYR0X
Memory44.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 14:39
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 269
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 755
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 897
56% 897 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 76.5%
 Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 23000030 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 525 553 531 572 538 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,892
Write 199
Mixed 1,121
SusWrite 540
206% 938 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 51.8
176% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 898
630% 790 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑
This bench: 196%
 Great: 321%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
477GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 173 168 180 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 409
Write 399
Mixed 358
SusWrite 171
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 43.1
146% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 88.6%
 Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
477GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 173 168 180 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 406
Write 383
Mixed 368
SusWrite 172
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 43.6
148% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 89.1%
 Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XW21KG-MIE2 04CB0000802C DDR4 3200 01980000802C XW21KG-MIE2 04CB0000802C DDR4 3200 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.4% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 25.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 20.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 61.4%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples183x
Ryzen 7 5800AMDBench 96%, 1,982 samples168x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples117x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples149x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples83x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples69x
SSD
NVMe SK hynix 1TBPc711Bench 277%, 5,603 samples70x
2300 NVMe 512GBMicronBench 226%, 3,314 samples48x
2300 NVMe 1024GBMicronBench 241%, 4,924 samples37x
RAM
X2YH1K-MIE-NX 1x16GBUnknownBench 46%, 1,144 samples51x
XJ69DF-MIE2 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 2,320 samples48x
XW21KG-MIE2 2x8GBUnknownBench 84%, 2,787 samples44x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $999
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback