Pegatron H110D4-M1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPegatron H110D4-M1  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON H110D4-M1
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 09:15
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
Socket 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 189
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 346
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 21.2
13% 21.3 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 20
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 174 185 202 211 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 428
Write 387
Mixed 307
SusWrite 222
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 39.3
133% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 308
234% 317 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 114%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
0GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 407
Mixed 386
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 45
146% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 315
238% 321 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110D4-M1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron H110D4-M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback