Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '17 at 21:09
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 93.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 237 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 429 56% 420 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2350 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (74 fps cap detected)	55.1% Above average	Lighting 74.7 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 67.3 61% 72.2 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 73.6 Splatting 74.7 44% 49.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -66219804858573 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5293 (B5) Unknown 0 0 2 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5272 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 613842 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 613842 (F2) Unknown 100 100 414017 (F9) Unknown 100 100 21925	65.3% Good	Read 480 Write 163 Mixed 240 64% 294 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 16.3 99% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 51.8 70% 127 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 187GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 196 242 (03) Spinup time 178 171 4066 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7177 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 8 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23111 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6673 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6806 (C2) HDA temperature 115 101 32 (C4) Reallocation count 193 193 7 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 11281 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.3% Average	Read 72.7 Write 88.4 Mixed 79.9 61% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.41 101% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 74%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 144GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 65537 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 120 (03) Spinup time 143 143 25793135040 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 10281 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 32 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 33487 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7898 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 10960 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 10960 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 219044708383 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4	42.3% Average	Read 85.1 Write 62 Mixed 70.8 55% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.33 84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 61%
Seagate ST2000DM001-9YN164 640GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 59GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 156 154 5166 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11189 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 35874 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8431 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 731 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11182 (C2) HDA temperature 117 97 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1065 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.1% Average	Read 85.1 Write 61.4 Mixed 66.2 53% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.37 96% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB 2,942 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.7% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 22.7 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 21.5 56% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	185x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	170x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	158x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	50x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 2,134 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16