Motile M141

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMotile M141  (all builds)
MotherboardMOTILE PF4PU1F
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 12.4
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 102
24% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 193
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Device(1D05 1077) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.26
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSM28128GPTCB3B-S112611 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 343
Write 245
Mixed 242
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 15.5
56% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 4.9
35% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 73%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
144GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 205 153 184 188 154 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 306
Write 222
Mixed 291
SusWrite 193
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 12.9
57% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 144
107% 141 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-S16G-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 382
10% 382 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M141 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Motile M141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback