HP EliteBook 850 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 127
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 194
29% 209 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.1
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.6
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 105 108 128 124 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 426
Write 238
Mixed 306
SusWrite 121
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 29.4
102% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 135
123% 186 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
23GB free
Firmware: GS2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 89 88 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 109
Write 112
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 87.9
60% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston XF875V-MIH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G3 Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback