HP EliteBook 850 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 19:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 139
53% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 179
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.24% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 6.4
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 122 111 117 124 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65% Good
Read 427
Write 250
Mixed 302
SusWrite 124
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 30.7
106% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 133
110% 157 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
23GB free
Firmware: GS2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 114
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 86.9
59% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston XF875V-MIH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G3 Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback