Lenovo 81FS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81FS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 17:52
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-4350B R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Memory 2.21
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 42
14% 27.1 Pts
4-Core 42
8-Core 48.1
6% 45 Pts
64-Core 43.4
3% 43.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.4
2% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 5.2
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ABS120G 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 41 25 44 49 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36% Below average
Read 344
Write 281
Mixed 261
SusWrite 59
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 5.8
48% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 45.5
53% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 116 126 120 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 95.1
Write 110
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 116
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0xCD04 F4-3200C22-8GRS 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 483
8% 483 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FS Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback