HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8105
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 184
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 302
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 8105) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.74% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 5.4
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
738GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 327 304 304 339 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 329
Write 354
Mixed 289
SusWrite 320
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 39.3
127% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 86.4
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 108
95% 138 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 125%
Jmicron generic 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 160 176 181 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 179
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 174
208% 156 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1
418% 5.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 0.9
448% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback