Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PC_FX516PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PC_FX516PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PC
Memory13 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211130
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 11:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 226
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 605
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 13BC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.8% Above average
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 101
Parallax 76.5
64% 85.3 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 61.4
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 51 56 51 57 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 1,012
Write 123
Mixed 260
SusWrite 57.5
78% 363 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 35.4
116% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 168
182% 324 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FF 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PC_FX516PC Builds (Compare 1,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PC_FX516PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback