GPU GWTN141-10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGPU GWTN141-10  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210330
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 04:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 62
1-Core 146
2-Core 273
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 575
63% 497 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 18.8
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 29
Splatting 13.1
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 512GB 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09951
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 344 320 345 348 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 296
Write 334
Mixed 265
SusWrite 344
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 15.5
53% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 177
143% 198 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTN141-10 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN141-10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback