Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 840 G8 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 880D
Memory	52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230105
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 11 '23 at 00:47
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1165G7 51,565 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 67.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 245 82% 151 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 364 50% 371 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% HP(103C 880D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 7.7 Parallax 17.8 13% 13.7 fps	MRender 18.1 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 15.7 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H7 512GB 692 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 326GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0TEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 573 603 714 777 782 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	Read 1,336 Write 1,057 Mixed 896 SusWrite 671 221% 990 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 48.9 171% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 569 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 500 340% 424 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 316%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 2x31.5GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 29 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 18 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 169%, 5,284 samples	102x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GBSamsungBench 130%, 3,023 samples	73x
MTFDHBA512QFD-1AX1AABHA 512GBCrucialBench 153%, 1,824 samples	62x

RAM
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples	117x
8ATF2G64HZ-3G2F1 1x16GBMicronBench 42%, 619 samples	78x
HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 4,293 samples	75x