Microelectronics G439

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G439  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4(MS-7D25)
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateMay 10 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 197
2-Core 395
115% 223 Pts
4-Core 774
8-Core 1364
129% 1,069 Pts
64-Core 2,159
134% 2,159 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 111%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 221
Parallax 218
199% 227 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 161
Splatting 131
142% 181 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,074
Write 1,567
Mixed 2,096
426% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 67.6
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 95.2
342% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,808
DQ Write 1613
DQ Mixed 1,272
1,074% 1,564 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
749GB free
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,562
Write 2,184
Mixed 2,401
531% 2,382 MB/s
4K Read 78.4
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 118
394% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 2,213
DQ Write 2,055
DQ Mixed 2,107
1,589% 2,125 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
388GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 473
Mixed 440
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 33
110% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 202
149% 195 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVKS Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVKS 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 23.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G439 Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback