Gigabyte GA-H510M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H510M H  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 21:50
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 85.8
1-Core 166
2-Core 309
101% 187 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 819
90% 712 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 137
Parallax 98.5
86% 114 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 86.8
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 68 64 61 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.3% Poor
Read 242
Write 53.6
Mixed 131
SusWrite 60.7
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 2.6
39% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 99.8
78% 109 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
875GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 195 196 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 197
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 195
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 8G2400CL17 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 18.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H510M H Builds (Compare 7,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H510M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback