Acer Aspire X3812

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire X3812  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WG43M
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 16:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6300-$66
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Memory 32.7
1-Core 26.4
2-Core 40.9
22% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 54.9
8-Core 44.1
7% 49.5 Pts
64-Core 35.9
2% 35.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 61 49 54 79 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 254
Write 22.6
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 66.8
20% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 7.4
36% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 25.1
48% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 1.5
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3812 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3812

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback