Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 WS-E/10G  (all builds)
Memory119.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 808
70% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,785
110% 1,785 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 117
Parallax 133
112% 129 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 134
Splatting 109
112% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
627GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 537 555 589 587 568 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1058
Write 908
Mixed 912
SusWrite 563
193% 860 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 48.5
158% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 398
302% 408 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 144%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 266 226 157 163 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 456
Write 437
Mixed 362
SusWrite 216
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 38.2
124% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 332
251% 336 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 265 280 290 291 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 452
Write 431
Mixed 385
SusWrite 280
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 38.7
124% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
216GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 150 127 132 142 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 154
Write 141
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 135
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.M16FA 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
125% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 46.3
146% 51.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 WS-E/10G Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $863
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback