HP ProDesk 400 G6 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G6 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 859B
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 09:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 248
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 514
66% 496 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
Nvidia(10DE 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 17.1
17% 18.6 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 16
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KIOXIA-EXCERIA S 250GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 859 313 346 356 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 979
Write 952
Mixed 486
SusWrite 546
166% 741 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 25.8
121% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 746
588% 810 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 146%
Great: 191%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G6 SFF Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G6 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback