MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 996
95% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,002
62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8840) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 103
Parallax 95.2
84% 101 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 96
Splatting 81
75% 93.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 804 810 809 819 810 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2,255
Write 1,879
Mixed 1,318
SusWrite 823
350% 1,569 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 53.8
172% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 198
223% 404 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 217%
Great: 355%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
165GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 389 400 409 380 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 385
Mixed 319
SusWrite 387
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 34.8
119% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 224
174% 245 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
703GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 408 410 261 59 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 368
Write 357
Mixed 370
SusWrite 318
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 154
139% 218 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80%
Great: 125%
MB8000GFECR 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: HPG6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 195 199 204 207 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 199
Write 179
Mixed 99
SusWrite 200
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 1
7% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 26%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 184 182 182 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 132
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 181
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 105 106 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 106
130% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4RL.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 28.9
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 28.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $852
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback