Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 33.6 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 128 41% 77 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 364 36% 291 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 80D4) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.2% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 6.6 5% 9.4 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 9.6 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.2% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 112 110 111 100 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 463 Write 194 Mixed 215 SusWrite 110 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 18.3 67% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 140 124% 190 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 147%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	408x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	281x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	87x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	173x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	74x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	62x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	61x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	32x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	32x