Maxsun MS-B85-BTC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardMaxsun MS-B85-BTC  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 183
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 340
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.4% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 68
Parallax 60.3
47% 62 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 53.4
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 480GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 234 166 62 346 312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 443
Write 387
Mixed 352
SusWrite 250
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 11.3
92% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 14
55% 122 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 9905471-011.A00LF 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-B85-BTC Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Maxsun MS-B85-BTC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback