Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 23:55
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 505
55% 435 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250X
Asus(1043 043B) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.00.62
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 23.1
14% 19.4 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 12.7
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 80 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66% Good
Read 444
Write 425
Mixed 276
SusWrite 77.7
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 35.7
130% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 45.9
44% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66%
Great: 110%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
330GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 81 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 94.4
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 79.7
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 52%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
437GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 95.3
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 88.5
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 80.5
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 92
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
408GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 87.1
Write 82.9
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 82.3
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
34GB free, PID 0803
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 68 69 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 136
Write 120
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 70.2
107% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 52%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
10GB free, PID 6410
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 8.7 12 11 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 100
Write 19.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.4
29% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $698
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback