Lenovo 81WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81WS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210520
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 416
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 15.1
12% 12.4 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 17.2
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0C0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 344 353 352 367 359 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1610
Write 1,141
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 372
233% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 73.3
249% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 318
368% 630 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 199%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 18.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81WS Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback