HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 207
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 539
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 69.2
59% 71 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 55.1
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 939
Write 805
Mixed 673
179% 806 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 41.3
130% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 559
431% 591 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 190%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
372GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 311
Write 212
Mixed 315
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 34
101% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 149
154% 253 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
878GB free
Firmware: SDM3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.1
Write 106
Mixed 60.4
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Verbatim Store 'n' Go 1GB
1GB free, PID 2004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6.5
Write 2
Mixed 4.7
5% 4.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 3.2
7% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
29GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.4
Write 3.2
Mixed 9.2
13% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
75% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
15GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23
Write 2.5
Mixed 9.7
12% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.2
124% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C16FG Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback