Medion MD34379/C895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34379/C895  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 20:10
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 626
71% 553 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Elitegroup(1019 1046) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 40.9
29% 38.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 26.8
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 256 268 259 246 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 965
Write 297
Mixed 343
SusWrite 257
102% 465 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 21.4
113% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 332
256% 352 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 187%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
791GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 165 181 179 178 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 188
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 175
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34379/C895 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34379/C895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback