Medion MD34379/C895

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	3.12% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Medion MD34379/C895 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B360H4-EM
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 06 '23 at 19:59
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 234 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 528 63% 484 Pts	64-Core 648 40% 648 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Elitegroup(1019 1046) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 38.8 Parallax 37 29% 37.2 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 36 Splatting 27.7 27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GB 650 User benchmarks, average bench 140% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 22 22 22 20 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	3.12% Terrible	Read 7 Write 21 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 20.6 4% 15 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.1 5% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 187%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 790GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 122 121 128 131 127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 12.5 Write 122 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 126 51% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.1 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 1x8GB 5,207 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 9.6 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 7.7 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34379/C895 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Medion MD34379/C895

CPU
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x

SSD
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GBBench 140%, 650 samples	7x
CT500P3 500GBNvmeBench 209%, 237 samples	2x

RAM
9905702-017.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 5,207 samples	5x
9905702-017.A00G Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GBKingstonBench 67%, 6 samples	2x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16