HP 700-029eb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 700-029eb  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 15:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 164
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 532
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 69.6
60% 73.2 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 69.1
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 400 401 454 427 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 416
Mixed 408
SusWrite 385
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 41.9
133% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 282
232% 330 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 125%
WD WD40NPZZ-00PDPT0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 102 98 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 107
Write 95.3
Mixed 67
SusWrite 99.1
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2L16BC4R1-B0AS 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-029eb Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: HP 700-029eb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback