HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory10.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 08:47
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 360
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4292) 1GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 22.2
14% 18.8 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1LE05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 158 154 158 155 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 220
Write 160
Mixed 150
SusWrite 150
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 18.7
60% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 21.3
18% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2L16BC4R1-B0AS 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback