Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 34.7 1-Core 36.3 2-Core 55.7 26% 42.2 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 250 21% 181 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80 7,194 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.U SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 186 190 266 180 156 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 292 Write 268 Mixed 240 SusWrite 203 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 26 88% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 64.7 88% 163 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 104%
Samsung MZYTE256HMHP-000L2 256GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 50GB free Firmware: EXT06L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 256 257 256 257 258 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 405 Write 262 Mixed 197 SusWrite 257 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 19.2 74% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 74.9 100% 181 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 375GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 142 143 142 144 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 151 Write 137 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 142 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 99 98 98 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 117 Write 107 Mixed 98.8 SusWrite 98.7 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 67%
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G1 80GB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 69GB free Firmware: 00000009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 57 56 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 47.1 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 56.5 37% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 35%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 112GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 108 Write 14.7 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 13.1 36% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 52% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 39%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 903GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 118 119 118 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 117 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 118 136% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.8 233% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 223%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 15.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 6 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 229 18% 229 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16