TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 20:38
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 474
53% 419 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 73.3%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1441) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 87.5
Parallax 7.2
5% 33.6 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.5
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.56%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN730 SDB 512GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 767 854 795 923 901 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 983
Write 1,156
Mixed 1,167
SusWrite 868
236% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 43.5
133% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 468
385% 543 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 160%
 Great: 260%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1217 312 314 313 314 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,540
Mixed 1076
SusWrite 464
252% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 30.6
126% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 585
459% 637 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑
This bench: 152%
 Great: 262%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 168 169 166 168 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 165
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 167
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 90.4%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CWE 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 13.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 48.1%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples4,180x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples1,010x
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples861x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples3,003x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples1,146x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples811x
SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 179%, 2,900 samples988x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TBWDCBench 219%, 2,501 samples632x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GBWDCBench 153%, 1,070 samples544x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples1,920x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 13,312 samples552x
HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 45%, 4,229 samples536x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback