Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170221
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	May 05 '23 at 07:48
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 203 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 601 60% 490 Pts	64-Core 609 38% 609 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 84%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 35 25 2.2 40 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 409 Write 315 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 18.2 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 16.6 53% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 0.7 DQ Mixed 0.7 13% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 55%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250 3,745 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 503GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 80 89 88 89 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 91.3 Write 84.2 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 86.1 56% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 62%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB 3,381 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 910GB free Firmware: CV12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 171 179 177 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 175 Mixed 82.9 SusWrite 176 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 99%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 114 118 118 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 158 Write 79.4 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 118 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB 5,345 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 10.5 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	115x
Core i5-7400Intel $92Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	68x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	34x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	11x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16