Acer TravelMate P214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P214  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Timpani_TL
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 07:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 234
77% 143 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 544
55% 445 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1490) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 22.6
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 13.7
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1738 1663 1675 1639 1755 1295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,254
Write 2,103
Mixed 1,114
SusWrite 1,627
346% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 38.2
177% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 634
495% 682 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 234%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 11.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P214 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback