Lenovo 4384V8V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4384V8V  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4384V8V
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20100607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 18:20
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 124
52% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 161
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Carte graphique HD Intel
Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.75 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 1.35
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725016A9A364 160GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PCBZC70F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 74.9
Write 73.4
Mixed 59.4
52% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.35
61% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
24GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 14.4
Mixed 18.6
24% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.34
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 1.32
131% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback